Moody: Trump’s win should make Canada more tax competitive

Article content material

Like many Canadians, I used to be glued to the continuous protection of the election results in the United States final week, with my tax mind going into overdrive excited about how Canada would reply to a high-tax-loving Kamala Harris win versus a low-tax-high-tariff Donald Trump win, which in the end got here to go.

Regardless of doomsday predictions about what Trump 2.0 will imply for Canada, the brief story is that we’ve seen a part of this screenplay earlier than. Throughout his first tenure, there was a large bundle of U.S. tax cuts and reform rolled out in 2017, together with important company tax reform, private tax cuts and property tax adjustments.

Article content material

Many Canadians, together with me, have been rightly involved that Canada’s financial system would battle mightily and lose floor from a aggressive perspective. Good management requires proactively surveying the panorama and making daring, considerate selections primarily based upon conclusions drawn from such evaluation. It additionally requires responding thoughtfully to rivals and/or threats.

Article content material

Accordingly, many have been ready for our federal government to supply good management and to reply rapidly and thoughtfully to make sure our aggressive panorama wouldn’t be dangerously eroded when Trump’s tax reforms have been introduced and applied in 2017. As a substitute, then finance minister Invoice Morneau constantly repeated that Canada wouldn’t reply in a “knee-jerk” response.

Eleven months later, the Department of Finance responded in a non-knee-jerk trend. It was a pathetic response to main tax competitors.

“Eleven months because the U.S. launched and effectuated historic tax reform (and 11 months of listening to the Canadian Division of Finance’s normal talking level stating that they won’t reply to U.S. tax reform in a knee-jerk trend), the Authorities of Canada at this time offered a non-response. We imagine it’s honest to say, mission completed; the federal government didn’t react in any respect and positively there was no precise knee-jerk,” I said at the time.

Article content material

Article content material

“The non-response ‘accomplishes’ three issues: it gives a full deduction for brand spanking new purchases of producing and processing tools and sure new ‘inexperienced’ know-how tools; it will increase the first-year deduction for different new depreciable property purchases; and it gives no company or private tax fee reductions.”

These measures didn’t materially transfer the needle. Six years later, Canada has continued to not reply. As a substitute, we now have had a bevy of tax will increase (together with the ridiculous capital gains inclusion rate enhance) and politically motivated interventionist tax adjustments. Our nation’s productivity continues to say no to dangerously low levels and we aren’t in any respect tax aggressive with the U.S.

Trump 2.0 has already offered robust alerts as to what he’ll do relating to tax coverage. For instance, he has publicly stated he’s dedicated to extending a number of the 2017 tax adjustments that have been scheduled to run out on the finish of subsequent 12 months and make them everlasting. He has additionally promised important company tax cuts on home manufacturing, amongst different guarantees.

Article content material

“Whether or not smart or not, many of those adjustments would encourage financial development,” economist Jack Mintz said final week. “A decrease company revenue tax fee, deregulation and vitality renewal can be magnets for funding from Canada.”

With many profitable Canadians and companies already leaving Canada, that magnet pull must be counteracted.

Good management, subsequently, would take a proactive method. As a substitute of merely responding to measures which can be positive to come back (and even copying such measures), Canada ought to get forward of them and implement pro-growth measures. What might a few of these measures be?

Effectively, tax reform is a should. Reform ought to embrace measures that may rapidly help in unlocking development.

Corporate tax changes must be a part of the general tax reform. Mintz calls this a “big bang corporate tax reform.”

Private tax cuts throughout the board are additionally a should. Most provinces have a mixed private tax fee exceeding 50 per cent on the excessive finish. Accordingly, we aren’t aggressive with the U.S. and that hole must shrink. Frankly, utilizing Mintz’s phrasing, we want “huge bang” private tax reform as effectively.

Article content material

A less complicated tax system and statute are additionally a should.

And to assist pay for the required tax cuts and reform, deep and important authorities expenditure reductions must be accomplished.

Given the federal authorities has proven an indifference to offering good tax management, it’s extremely potential that we’ll see a repeat of it “not responding in a knee-jerk trend.” If that’s the case, then plenty of the doomsday predictions might come to fruition and our nation’s productiveness will proceed to endure and decline.

Sadly, our federal authorities doesn’t have it in them to vary course and supply good tax management. As a substitute, it’s going to require a authorities change that solely an election can present.

The Conservative Party introduced earlier this 12 months that it will implement a Tax Reform Task Force inside 60 days of getting elected to implement decrease taxes on work and manufacturing, simplify tax guidelines, reduce company welfare and cut back the share of taxes paid by the poor and so-called center class. That is precisely what our nation wants to reply to Trump 2.0.

Article content material

With the federal election scheduled to occur in October 2025 (until we’re in some way lucky sufficient to get an earlier name to the polls), our present authorities nonetheless has a number of time to “not reply in a knee-jerk trend.” One can solely hope that such a non-response can even not embrace continued home insurance policies which can be damaging and easily political.

Canadians can ill-afford to have our tax competitiveness decline additional.

Kim Moody, FCPA, FCA, TEP, is the founding father of Moodys Tax/Moodys Non-public Consumer, a former chair of the Canadian Tax Basis, former chair of the Society of Property Practitioners (Canada) and has held many different management positions within the Canadian tax neighborhood. He might be reached at kgcm@kimgcmoody.com and his LinkedIn profile is https://www.linkedin.com/in/kimgcmoody. 

_____________________________________________________________

In case you like this story, join the FP Investor Publication.

_____________________________________________________________

Bookmark our web site and assist our journalism: Don’t miss the enterprise information it’s good to know — add financialpost.com to your bookmarks and join our newsletters here.

Article content material