The Art and Science of DC Plan Investment Design

Since their emergence within the Seventies, outlined contribution (DC) plans in america have advanced. One notable change has been a shift in how they develop funding lineups for participant-directed DC plans. Plan sponsors are progressing from merely utilizing generally held funding beliefs to making a construction that deliberately considers the traits and wishes of their distinctive group of members.

On this article, I define the method for creating such a construction from an asset class perspective. A key part to considerate DC plan funding design is crafting a diversified funding construction earlier than deciding on particular funding automobiles.

Regulatory Basis & Steerage for Funding Menu Construction

The Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA) mandates that plan fiduciaries act prudently and diversify the plan’s investments to reduce the danger of enormous losses. By offering a larger diploma of asset class diversification, plan sponsors can allow extra alternatives for members who self-direct their retirement account to mitigate funding danger.

For DC plans topic to ERISA, there are a number of prescriptive necessities, together with a principles-based customary of care (responsibility of loyalty and responsibility of care) that plan fiduciaries should observe when constructing a plan’s funding construction. Even for plans not topic to ERISA, many plan sponsors contemplate the rules set forth underneath ERISA as finest observe and select to implement them.

Typically, ERISA part 404(c) supplies DC plan fiduciaries safety from the legal responsibility for participant funding selections if they provide a minimal of three diversified funding choices that bear materially completely different danger and return traits, akin to fairness, fastened revenue, and money equivalents.

In observe, it’s fairly uncommon for an funding construction to be restricted to only three funding choices. It’s because many funding fiduciaries consider that providing a bigger, diversified alternative set is useful for members. Underneath the Pension Safety Act of 2006, sure pre-diversified funding choices, akin to Goal Date Funds (TDFs), are thought-about certified default funding options (QDIA), which supplies a protected harbor to mitigate fiduciary danger.

The US Division of Labor (DOL) supplies steerage for the number of TDFs in addition to periodic critiques of continued suitability. The DOL steerage is finest observe and plan sponsors ought to leverage it when evaluating TDF utilization of their plan’s funding construction. Plan sponsors ought to set up a structured course of that first identifies a TDF philosophy after which critiques participant demographic knowledge, together with retirees, to evaluate and finally choose an applicable TDF suite. The identical participant knowledge evaluate can be helpful when assessing a plan’s core funding construction.

Past ERISA necessities and optionally available protected harbor provisions, DC plans’ named funding fiduciaries and their 3(21) funding advisors and three(38) funding managers have wide-ranging funding construction flexibility if selections are made in the very best curiosity of members and beneficiaries. Such flexibility permits for an array of appropriate funding choices, which could be overwhelming for plan sponsors.

Crafting a Strong Funding Construction

Whereas the variability of DC plan participant teams’ wants and traits precludes a set method of a “proper” or “unsuitable” funding lineup design course of, plan sponsors ought to preserve a prudent and documented choice course of to fulfill their fiduciary obligations underneath ERISA.

A complete design course of is multi-step, calls for engagement by a plan sponsor’s retirement plan committee, and is finest led by a professional retirement plan advisor who’s dedicated to facilitating committee conversations and making ready demographic and fund utilization critiques, amongst different duties.

A Pattern Course of in Seven Steps

1. Determine a objective & goals assertion

Determine the corporate’s philosophy concerning the DC plan’s major objective and goals. Pattern statements and their potential influence on funding construction:

Function: It’s important that our DC plan mirror the corporate’s purpose to advertise a tradition of “retirement atmosphere.” This could manifest as: lengthy worker tenure, workers who generally retire from our firm, and retirees who discover it engaging to retain their DC plan accounts within the employer’s plan all through retirement.

Potential influence: The aim assertion would possibly counsel that plan asset courses and TDFs help a retiree’s must diversify fastened revenue allocations, as a result of fastened revenue sometimes turns into a bigger portion of an investor’s portfolio close to all through retirement.

Function: It’s important that our DC plan additional the corporate’s purpose of supporting workers as they save and make investments for retirement. We observe that our firm has a protracted historical past of using largely early-career individuals, and based mostly on previous expertise, we anticipate excessive worker turnover that leads to few, if any, retirements from the corporate. When retirements happen, we observe that accounts are faraway from the DC plan shortly thereafter.

Potential influence: The aim assertion would possibly benefit the inclusion of a number of fairness asset courses and core or core plus fastened revenue as a result of, for the non-TDF investor phase, this design would offer for ample fairness diversification, whereas minimizing the necessity to allocate to separate fastened revenue sub-asset courses. It additionally would possibly lend itself to a TDF designed for prime fairness allocations early in its glide path and low-to-moderate fairness allocations (relative to the TDF universe common) close to the goal retirement age.

2. What % of members are enrolled in managed account providers and/or self-directed brokerage accounts?

Participant enrollment in a managed account service is often low sufficient that it doesn’t affect the plan’s total funding construction, except for making certain the service’s minimal required asset courses are included. But when the managed account service serves because the plan’s QDIA, and retention within the QDIA is excessive, establish the asset courses the managed account supplier will use and never use. Carry out a cost-benefit evaluation of together with asset courses past these required by the managed service supplier.

3. Develop a participant group profile to grasp the plan’s buyers.

A DC plan’s participant group profile ought to be based mostly on demographics and investor sort. Since every plan’s participant group has various demographic traits, don’t depend on participant group averages for data akin to age, compensation, schooling stage, and firm tenure. Analyzing averages usually fails to mirror the breadth of a plan’s distinctive participant group, in addition to any concentrated segments that signify the most important variety of members.

When creating the participant group profile, consider what finest describes the largest variety of members. Plan sponsors might divide members into the next classes:

a. Investor sort

• The “do it for me” sort: Contributors who elect to put money into the QDIA; any fund with broad asset allocation, akin to goal danger or different asset allocation funds; or a managed account service.
• The “do it myself” sort: Contributors who elect to speculate largely in particular person asset class funds or a self-directed brokerage account.

If “do it for me” is the plan’s predominant investor sort, the funding construction might or might not must include greater than the first asset courses relying on the profile of the “do it myself” buyers. For instance, if the “do it myself” buyers have a excessive stage of funding proficiency or are more likely to have their very own private funding advisors, the funding construction could also be justifiably extra complete. Nevertheless, relying on the traits and variety of the “do it myself” buyers, advert hoc requests from members for particular sub-asset class choices and different funding automobiles could also be finest addressed by providing a self-directed brokerage possibility.

b. Demographic profile

• Determine the quantity and % of members by age vary and investor sort.
• Search for any prevalent age cohorts. Understanding the focus in every age cohort can sign consideration for particular wants.

c. Funding proficiency of non-QDIA buyers

• Rank the committee’s notion of participant funding proficiency as excessive, medium, or low. Funding proficiency could be estimated based mostly on how properly the “do it myself” group makes use of non-QDIA asset courses. For instance, is there a sample of choosing few asset courses, and does the sample differ by age cohort?
• It’s cheap to anticipate early-career members to make use of fewer asset courses. For this cohort, there may be more likely to be a concentrate on equities over fastened revenue. It’s cheap to imagine the chosen variety of asset courses would improve for mid- and late-career cohorts as a result of diversification and danger mitigation are inclined to turn out to be extra valued.
• One other strategy to observe funding proficiency is through the use of a scatter plot of participant fairness/fastened revenue allocation splits by age, in comparison with a pattern TDF allocation. The plan’s recordkeeper ought to be capable to present this data. If the scatter plot exhibits extensive dispersion from the pattern TDF allocation, it’s cheap to imagine funding proficiency is probably going low. A low diploma of funding proficiency can affect whether or not the funding construction designed for non-QDIA buyers could be streamlined by excluding non-core asset courses, akin to commodities.

d. Draw back danger tolerance

Utilizing an identical low-medium-high ranking system, gauge draw back danger tolerance of the most important participant phase. Draw back danger tolerance is a vital think about intentional funding construction design and QDIA choice.

To assist establish participant draw back danger tolerance, plan sponsors can:

• Assessment recordkeeping reviews of transfers into and out of funding choices throughout calendar quarters instantly following a market downturn or massive loss in a selected asset class.
• If the business doesn’t require post-secondary schooling for many workers, draw back danger tolerance is comparatively low and most plan sponsors will eclude asset courses topic to extra frequent and important losses. Alternatively, if superior ranges of schooling are required, plan sponsors might wish to assume a reasonable to excessive stage of draw back danger tolerance.

e. Stability of workforce

If turnover and liquidations by laid-off workers are excessive, it’s cheap to imagine that the funding construction and any TDFs supplied ought to lean towards a low draw back danger profile.

f. Presence of an outlined profit pension plan

Along with the DC plan, does the corporate additionally sponsor an outlined profit pension plan that it intends to maintain lively with continued profit accruals? Does it present ample, focused alternative revenue to long-term workers? If sure, does the corporate view the DC plan as “supplemental”? On this occasion, it’s cheap to imagine that the funding construction of the DC plan could also be restricted to broad, core asset courses.

4. Assessment the variety of asset class choices.

The variety of asset courses ought to be knowledgeable by the plan’s objective and goals assertion and participant group profile, moderately than proactively setting an arbitrary restrict on the variety of asset courses. The latter motion might lead to plan sponsors overlooking the very best pursuits and wishes of “do it myself” buyers. As the preferred QDIA, TDFs permit much less engaged members, or these with decrease funding proficiency, to keep away from confusion or challenges in making asset allocation selections.

The typical variety of funding choices has declined as a result of members who’re much less snug making knowledgeable funding selections now have larger entry to pre-diversified choices like TDFs or managed accounts. For reference, the typical variety of funding choices (not asset courses) supplied by plans is at present 21. The three highest ranges by respondents have been:

1. 1 to fifteen choices: 21.5%,
2. 16 to twenty choices: 26.2%
3. 26 or extra: 25.9% 

5. Keep away from sophisticated funding menu design.

If the participant group profile suggests a streamlined funding construction and variety of funding choices, maintain the next factors in thoughts.

• A number of funding choices in the identical asset courses: Provide just one possibility per asset class until the choices encompass an lively and passive implementation.
• International fairness and stuck revenue: If the funding construction has separate home and worldwide asset courses, world asset courses might lead to unintended overlap.
• Sector, regional, and country-specific asset courses, excluding actual property funding trusts (REITs): These asset courses have larger danger publicity on account of their extra particular or concentrated nature and different areas of the funding construction additionally seemingly have publicity to them. Remember that this may increasingly result in overlap and unintentional, massive allocations to particular areas of the market.
• Single-commodity asset courses: If commodities are applicable for the plan’s funding construction, the diversification impact of together with a automobile with broad-based commodity publicity might assist mitigate the danger related to publicity to a single commodity, akin to gold, oil, or small teams of commodities like treasured metals.
• Goal danger: Goal danger funds, which preserve a hard and fast or restricted vary of fairness versus fastened revenue, are vulnerable to unintentional misuse by members who stay in the identical fund for longer than applicable, moderately than shifting to lower-risk, lower-equity allocation variations as their time horizons lower.
• Cash market and steady worth funds: Steady worth funds have traditionally outperformed cash market funds as a result of they will put money into intermediate-term bonds and preserve principal safety by way of wrap insurance coverage. Together with each cash market and steady worth funds can complicate participant asset motion as a result of cash market funds are deemed “competing funds” to steady worth. Steady worth funds don’t allow direct transfers to competing funds akin to cash market or different low-duration fastened revenue funds.

6.  Assessment historic efficiency previous to asset class choice.

Assessment historic efficiency for the final 10 years of all asset courses thought-about for lineup inclusion to establish asset courses which can be too unstable or topic to massive losses. This can assist the committee perceive their historic patterns and magnitude of positive factors and losses. Concentrate on the most important positive factors and largest losses for every asset class in the course of the 10-year interval. Assessment the usual deviation for five- and 10-year durations.

7. Replace the group’s funding coverage assertion to doc permissible asset courses.

Test the DC plan’s Funding Coverage Assertion (IPS) to verify it expressly permits the specified asset courses. Amend the IPS, if wanted, earlier than making funding construction modifications to the plan menu.

Placing the Participant Group Profile into Follow

Listed here are two potential situations and the ensuing pattern funding buildings:

Participant Group A:

• Plan objective assertion: It’s important that our DC plan helps the corporate’s purpose of making a “retirement atmosphere” tradition that promotes lengthy tenure of employment with frequent retirements from our firm, and for retirees to search out it engaging to retain their plan accounts all through retirement.
• Plan at present affords a managed account service.
• The “do it myself” buyers signify 60% of members. The biggest age cohort is ages 50-80, and members have a excessive stage of funding proficiency.
• Eighty % of retirees go away their account within the plan for the long run and take systematic withdrawals following retirement.
• The “do it for me” buyers signify 40% of members. The biggest age cohort is the 21-40-year vary, and members have a excessive stage of funding proficiency.
• The workforce is steady and never topic to periodic layoffs based mostly on financial cycles.
• The corporate doesn’t present an outlined profit pension plan along with the DC plan.

Urged asset courses:

• Home fairness
  • Massive cap: development, core, and worth
• • Mid cap: development, core, and worth
• • Small cap: development, core, and worth
• Worldwide fairness
  • Massive cap: development, core, and worth
• Fastened revenue
  • Treasury inflation-protected securities
• Worldwide fastened revenue
• Broad-based commodities
• Asset allocation (TDFs)

Participant Group B:

• Plan objective assertion: It’s important that our DC plan displays the corporate’s purpose of making a tradition that helps workers as they save and make investments for retirement. Our group tends to make use of predominantly early profession folks. We anticipate and have traditionally skilled excessive worker turnover that leads to few, if any, retirements. When retirements happen, accounts are faraway from the plan shortly thereafter.
• Plan doesn’t at present supply a managed account service.
• The “do it myself” buyers signify 20% of members. The biggest age cohort is 40-45 years, and members have a reasonable stage of funding proficiency.
• Plan affords a self-directed brokerage possibility, utilized by roughly half of the “do it myself” buyers.
• The few members that stay within the plan previous age 65 have traditionally rolled over their accounts to particular person retirement accounts inside two years post-retirement.
• The “do it for me” buyers signify 80% of members and there are not any age cohorts with a materially increased focus than others. Contributors are assumed to have a low stage of funding proficiency.
• The workforce is steady and never topic to periodic layoffs based mostly on financial cycles.
• The corporate doesn’t present an outlined profit pension plan along with the DC plan.

Urged asset courses:

• Home fairness
• Worldwide fairness
• Fastened revenue
• Worldwide fastened revenue
• Asset allocation (TDFs)

Empowering Plan Sponsors

Utilizing an knowledgeable, structured funding design course of will bolster DC plan sponsor confidence that funding lineup choice selections are tailor-made to the wants of most plan members. The funding menu design course of ought to allow the plan sponsor to really feel educated about how the group arrived at its plan’s funding construction and why, in addition to present the data essential to doc a prudent decision-making course of, a key tenant of fiduciary responsibility underneath ERISA.

Should you favored this publish, don’t neglect to subscribe to Enterprising Investor and the CFA Institute Research and Policy Center.

All posts are the opinion of the creator(s). As such, they shouldn’t be construed as funding recommendation, nor do the opinions expressed essentially mirror the views of CFA Institute or the creator’s employer.

The fabric introduced herein is of a common nature and doesn’t represent the availability by PNC of funding, authorized, tax, or accounting recommendation to any particular person, or a suggestion to purchase or promote any safety or undertake any funding technique. The data contained herein was obtained from sources deemed dependable. Such data is just not assured as to its accuracy, timeliness, or completeness by PNC. The data contained and the opinions expressed herein are topic to alter with out discover.

PNC might present hyperlinks to different websites. Content material on such websites is offered solely for the consumer’s comfort. PNC makes no guarantee of any type relating to that content material and linking to such content material doesn’t represent or point out sponsorship, endorsement or affiliation in any means.

The PNC Monetary Providers Group, Inc. (“PNC”) makes use of the advertising title PNC Institutional Asset Administration® for the varied discretionary and non-discretionary institutional funding, trustee, custody, consulting, and associated providers offered by PNC Financial institution, Nationwide Affiliation (“PNC Financial institution”), which is a Member FDIC, and funding administration actions performed by PNC Capital Advisors, LLC, a wholly-owned subsidiary of PNC Financial institution. PNC doesn’t present authorized, tax, or accounting recommendation until, with respect to tax recommendation, PNC Financial institution has entered right into a written tax providers settlement. PNC Financial institution is just not registered as a municipal advisor underneath the Dodd-Frank Wall Avenue Reform and Shopper Safety Act.

“PNC Institutional Asset Administration” is a registered mark of The PNC Monetary Providers Group, Inc.

Investments: Not FDIC Insured. No Financial institution Assure. Could Lose Worth.

©2024 The PNC Monetary Providers Group, Inc. All rights reserved.

Investments: Not FDIC Insured. No Financial institution Assure. Could Lose Worth.

©2024 The PNC Monetary Providers Group, Inc. All rights reserved.

Picture credit score: ©Getty Pictures / Rudenkoi

Skilled Studying for CFA Institute Members

CFA Institute members are empowered to self-determine and self-report skilled studying (PL) credit earned, together with content material on Enterprising Investor. Members can document credit simply utilizing their online PL tracker.